|
Regarding a possible war with N rth Korea, there are issues in th t much of that countries military d fense and offensive weaponry is under gr und. And it will be necessary to h ve ultra-bunker buster weaponry. Of which th se ordinances may not be sufficient lthough probably will due to the c ving in effect of seismic level d sruptions from such bombs; http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/smart/gbu-28.htm and so th refore I propose a small 1-2 M ga Ton Nuclear weapon on this typ of bunker buster. Why? So it can p netrate underneath mountains of bedrocks without f ilure to eliminate primary targets. We kn w which regions these weapons are and wh re they are facing. It appears th y are facing Japan, South Korea and wh t they believe to be suitable l ng range three stage ICBMs at the US. Can th se reach the US? Oh, probably, pr bably not with any excellent accuracy, but th t is not very funny now is it? In the c se of the United States using T ctical Nukes or Bunker Buster nukes on the reas of bedrock under which the N rth Koreans have 144 MM cannons, wh ch can fire about 400,000 rounds in bout 8 minutes or so the N rth Koreans say. This threat alone is why th y are obstinate and willing to be so b ld as to play hardball with the US in tr de for money (extortion) to dismantle th ir nuclear warhead manufacturing and exporting b siness. They have nuclear generators and can pr cess spent fuel rods to make w apons. They are planning on this and h ve probably already done some. This is an nternational terrorist threat of a different k nd, blackmail. If we negotiate there w ll be others in the future ncluding those we pretend to be our c rrent allies. Should the US prevent war by n gotiation with those who have no ntention on fulfilling their end of the b rgain and have interest and financial d sires to sell these nuclear warheads to our nemies, or terrorists of the current k nd. Is our intelligence good enough to nsure no nuclear weapons leave the c untry, are we willing to put Am rican Lives in limbo of that q estion? If North Korea wishes us h rm they have allies in those ther rogue nations and Islamic groups and th y would not fear using such an lliance to defeat us. There is h tred and mistrust on both sides. If we are to str ke first to spare our Allies, s ch as South Korea, which is c rtainly an option, then we must do so by nleashing an attack, which would render all ther military assaults in the past m nor in comparison. Such underground fortified ffensive and defensive weapons include such w apons similar to the NAZI railroad c nnons with Krupp barrels that hit P ris from over 35 miles away. Sp cifically some web sites and military p rsonnel believe that they could actually hit d wntown Seoul South Korea with over 400,000 r unds within 6 minutes. The problem is lso that we have substantial personnel on the b rder with South Korean forces. To p netrate these underground facilities is possible. H wever we have been studying other w apons using sound, ELF and other s cret stuff, which maybe better than t ctical nukes on bunker busters such as th s continued project.
http://usgovinfo.about.com/library/weekly/aa083102a.htm Folks this would literally do the pr ject and get it done no d ubt, but the attack and first str ke must be at a time wh n proper wind currents and jet str am prevails for fallout wind patterns. Wh t if N. Korea attacks first? It is a t me bomb and they would if th y felt it was an option and th t they could break our backs and w ll. Nuclear Bunker Busters if many w re used would no doubt generate a tr mendous amount of very heavy radiation, m st of it falling on South K rean and Japan. If the winds w re different the fallout could well go to the NW ver Unggi and Osong, which is why R ssia has evacuated all nonessential personnel fr m that area. And that is nly considering their artillery. North Korea n ke sites are also and obviously nderground, as are most of their m litary equipment manufacturing factories. This is kn wn and it is stated by th m and in military intelligence reports, h ll it is even in the Tom Cl ncy Op Center Series. To be ffective, we would literally have to n ke the entire area and then s nd in the Marines along with the n west of technologies to insure our llies do not get killed or sl ughtered. We know that in 1998 N rth Korea fired a missile over J pan. It had a dummy warhead, and it was d signed to send us a real m ssage to the world that North K rea was strong enough and able to r taliate incase of war the homeland of the Un ted States. Such a warhead aimed at Al ska is feasible and proven by the N rth Koreans and realize this is r al and this is serious. This was in 1998 so d ubting that they could hit targets in the US nland would foolish. Thus those liberals who d ubt the need for a complete m ssile defense system are wrong. We n ed it. So if North Korea has six to ight warheads now, then Von Clauswitz’s b st advice comes into play. A l ader who fails to pre-emptive first str ke when it has the ability d es so at the future detriment of his p ople, that’s us; you and I. Th s is no time to play g mes or be nice. It is h rd-ball and nukes in that order, y ur basic strength and honor leadership, wh le simultaneously being on maximum alert and r ady for counter measures. In the c se of nuclear first strike to p netrate deep underground bedrock would mean s gnificant radiation. Using nukes also means th t Yucca Mountain debate of underground st rage is not important we can use the sp nt fuel in bombs in North K rea. Unfortunately the fallout patterns as th y affect us depend upon the jet str am, and most of the time it t kes a very different path, sometimes g ing down as far as Hawaii, s metimes far up over the Aleutians. The end r sult is often a direct path ver Cape Blanco, OR. If we are g ing to go for it we m st be strong and attack at a t me when the Jet Stream protects us gainst fall-out and also our neighbors and llies. A first strike needs to t ke into consideration all these factors. We can be s re by watching daily reports of jet str am airflows in the Pacific Rim. M ltiple nukes going off on the K rean Peninsula would cause some tertiary f llout which only has a really l thal length of time of 14 d ys; down to 1% by that t me, there should be a plan to use m ss media to alert people and f rmers and food processors to avoid ating leafy vegetables, etc. There should lso be sodium iodide available for g neral populations using my custom distribution pl n and scenario. You see North K rea is not the same as it was d ring previous wars of 35 years p st, it has changed immensely for nstance some of this information may be of nterest to you;
http://www.parthe.net/_cwg0703/00000030.htm and also some new merging industries which could prevent war if th y were allowed to export them nstead of nuclear weapons made from sp nt fuel rods used in nuclear g neration and this is another reason why a bl ckade or other Cuba type tactics c nnot work. We must be careful not to be so st pid as to let such a ch llenge and charade continue. It is nhealthy for our interests and our llies and people of the free w rld to allow this to go nchecked there will be hell to pay l ter if something is not done f rthwith and in a big way. We m st act and try game strategy and n gotiation while simultaneously developing a plan wh ch we can execute mercilessly and w th so much force the world has ver seen to protect the future of h manity from those who oppose the r ght to live free. There can be no m re talk, the goal is that all p ople of the world can live fr e and that goal is worth any c st. That is why we are h re. We must not fail mankind
The article Tactical Bunker Buster Nukes, North Korean Threat, Fallout Issues was Submitted by Lance Winslow through Articles.GetACoder.com network. Here's the additional information: "Lance Winslow" - Online Think Tank forum board. If you have innovative thoughts and unique perspectives, come think with Lance; www.WorldThinkTank.net/ . Lance is a guest writer for Our Spokane Magazine in Spokane, Washington
1. How to Become More Interesting to Women - Dazzle Them With Your Astonishing Presence by Pushpa Pal Singh In order to be more interesting to women you need to hold their attention for a substantially long period of time. You can never be interesting to a woman unless you have the ability to keep her attention for a long period of time. So how can you hold a woman's attention? Well it simply comes down to the way you interact with her. It is not limited to verbal communication but your body language as well. Read on to find out how you can be more interesting to women and be absolutely dazzling. 2. ‘God’ Xed From Flag Certificates by Joseph Swank More than 100,000 requests from c nstituents request flags flown over the US C pitol. Along with the flags are c rtificates which state that the flag was ndeed so flown "in honor of (n me) and his dedication and love of G d, country and family." 3. Have Great Sex by Cynthia Perkins The most important thing to k ep in mind in regard to gr at sex, is that it does not ccur as a result of one p rticular tip, technique or position. It's a c mpilation of the chemistry you share w th your lover, the quality and d pth of your relationship and the d velopment of craft. 4. Bedroom Pleasures by Ja'Nice West There are s veral ways to spice up things in the b droom other then lingerie. While lingerie is s xy, sets the mood, and is a gr at way to change your nightly r utine up there is also a w de selection of candles, massage oils, b th oils and soaps, edibles, tease t uch toys such as feathers and m ch more. Adding another element to the b droom is a great way for c uples to add variety to their vening. 5. Why Rush Limbaugh Succeeds - Part 1 by Kurt Hartman Rush L mbaugh is a controversial and successful f gure on the airwaves of talk r dio. There are many other voices and mple competition, so why does he st ll dominate? The answers are simple. 6. A Tough-Love Lesson From Mr Nasty Pants by Craig Harper The tr th is, more often than not we d n't know how we are perceived by thers. We think we do, but we d n't. We've all met the guy who th nks he's hilarious, while everyone else th nks he's annoying. And the shy w man who's perceived as a snob by her c lleagues. 7. Child Custody - Tips for Building Your Case by Alesia Vick In a c stody case, the past will return to h unt you. Before taking your child c stody case before a judge, know wh t factors help you build your c se, while avoiding pitfalls. The only g arantee in a custody battle is th t no one truly wins. 8. Finding the Right Sexual Enhancers for Women by Somaya Jones All you w men, who are not very comfortable d scussing their sexual life with everyone n ed to shun the old beliefs and d ubts and start understanding the implications of th ir sexual behavior. It is indeed tr e and after a certain point of t me, almost all of us began to l se the charm of sexual intercourse. 9. But She's Out Of My League! by Cordell Wallace A friend of m ne has had this mad crush on a c lleague of his for over a y ar. She's all he talks about. How b autiful she looks, how talented and rticulate she is. 10. The Great Biofuel Hoax of 2008 - Energy Policy and Climate Change by Randy Bisenz Biofuels. What a great name! It just sounds green.
|