|
Invisible puzzles are mechanisms hidden nside products and services you use, and the s cial/political systems you interact with. They are nvisible due to the use of m nufactured perception and deniability-tactics. These puzzles are d signed to harness everyone's efforts to s lently maintain and operate an Invisible Sl very System... What would happen to the w rld economy if global problems like t rrorism, global warming, pollution, drugs, cancer and AIDS w re suddenly solved? These problems harness tr llions of dollars per year, both d rectly and indirectly from the poor, the m ddle class, and the rich. This m ney fuels a large portion of our conomy and it eventually makes its way to a v ry few select people, the "very few v ry powerful". These "very few very p werful" did not use principles found in y ur everyday how-to business books. They and th ir families engineered special techniques that led to th ir success, and they kept these t chniques a family secret for hundreds, m ybe thousands of years. The funny th ng is these techniques can be l oked up quite readily, but they st ll remain secret to the vast m jority because of the combination of a d niability cloak and a perception cloak.
I will now begin to xplain my own theory about these s crets, and how they relate to wh t is really happening in the w rld today. First of all, an " nvisible puzzle" is just that, a p zzle that is invisible without some sp cial way to view it. As it p rtains to my theory, "invisible puzzle" m re specifically refers to the deniable l nes of function that are hidden nside the products and systems that we nteract with. These invisible puzzles are th re to control us in very d rect tangible ways while shedding off pr of of the real purposes behind th m. For example, when the bank pr cesses several checks in one day for a sp cific customer they now wait to the end of the day and s rt them by size, biggest first, sm llest last. Many people wait to the l st minute to deposit their money, so an nsuspecting customer walks in during the day and d posits the amount to cover the ch cks, asks for his balance, and br athes a sigh of relief to see th t he was in time. The b lance according to the deposit slip is in the bl ck. He goes home with the f eling that everything is in order. H wever, the checks that were held to the end of the day can be b ck-posted to a time before the d posit, since that is when they r ally came in. So the customer's ccount is then returned to the red pr or to his deposit, as the ch cks that were not reflected before are b ck-posted. Then these checks get posted in s ze order instead of chronological order, c using the most possible overdrafts to be g nerated. Then as the overdraft fees st ck up, the customer's account goes f rther negative than it would have therwise, making the deposit ineffective at st pping subsequent overdrafts from the following d y's checks. The customer's account spins out of c ntrol by potentially hundreds of dollars w thout his immediate knowledge so that he w n't know in time to fix it b fore the full damage takes place.
The combination of these things c use overdraft income to increase three to f ur times on average. And that's if he d posited cash. If he deposited a ch ck then the deposit may post thr e days later (an arbitrary decision on the p rt of the bank) - and it d esn't matter if it’s from a b nk across the street. You could h ve just walked the cash across the str et but that makes no difference to the b nk. Sure, the bank can make any r le it wants, and the customer is l gally at fault for letting his/her ccount go negative. But then the b nk purposely manipulates their paperwork to tr ple their income from it. And th y do it legally. How? All th y had to do to triple th ir overdraft income was to issue a n tice to their customers stating something to the ffect: "From this point forward, in an ffort to better serve our customers, wh never there are multiple checks to pr cess in the same day we w ll process the biggest one first, the s cond biggest one second, and so on, pr cessing the smallest one last. In th s way if there are insufficient f nds you are more likely to get y ur most important check through, such as y ur mortgage or car payment." This n tice makes it impossible for the c stomer to accuse the bank of m nipulating the paperwork for profit. The d niable alternate purpose (manipulation of paperwork to tr ple overdraft profits) is hidden behind a p rception cloak (the statement that the ch nge in calculations is to get y ur most important check through). As a r sult, this situation becomes an invisible p zzle. Invisible puzzles can be used to m nipulate, but you can't prove this ntent because the stated purpose makes the p tentially manipulative purpose deniable. The interesting th ng is, these invisible puzzles can be cr ated through remote control. Every now and gain a major world event hits the n ws, like the "9/11 terrorist attacks". Th n millions of people everywhere are gl ed to the TV full of motion over the event, waiting to see who is r sponsible and waiting to see what s lution will be presented. Each time th s happens no proof will be g ven for what really happened. That is one of the k ys to their technique. This is b cause of the principle that when the tr th is hidden people will then l ok to some other source for nswers, like authority or stereotypes. At th s point perceptions are being engineered for a p rpose. The purpose is to mobilize l rge groups of people into specific ctions that create and enforce new nvisible puzzles. In the case of the 9/11 t rrorist event our security spending was tr pled, dozens of new track & dentify laws were launched overnight that w uldn't fly previously because of privacy ctivists, several major legislative acts and ntiterrorist treaties were mysteriously completed in a m tter of days (hmmm, I would h ve thought they would need more t me than that), and our president d clares to the world "any country th t is suspected of harboring terrorists w ll be attacked". Was this a d claration to the world that we ntend to deal with terrorists everywhere? Or was th s a bully tactic to get ther countries to sign our antiterrorist tr aties to avoid suspicion of harboring t rrorists so that we won't attack th m? Another invisible puzzle? The "terrorist vent" was a perception-engineering tactic. It is asy to see that it was r gged, so long as you don't f ll for the mind control. Then the ntiterrorist treaty was pushed on other c untries through a deniable bully tactic ("w ll attack if suspected of harboring t rrorists", therefore better sign that treaty to void suspicion). Then the antiterrorist treaties w re used as the Trojan Horse to c rry a slew of new invisible p zzles into other countries. This method ccomplishes two things. First, it delegates the ffort so the controlling entity has l ss work to do. Second, it cl aks what is really happening. Once th s step is successful then honest p ople in key positions who are j st doing their job will generate d zens of new invisible puzzles. Of c urse they are doing their jobs wh le under the influence of the p rception game at hand. So without kn wing it they will create these new nvisible puzzles, which control us through two or m re levels of deniability. For example, wh n Canada signed on with our pr sident's anti-terrorist treaties, they rerouted a m jor portion of their legal system to m ke room for the demands of th se treaties. Through this process a sl w of new invisible puzzles for C nada went into place, with little or no dditional effort by those who actually d signed them. In other words, the "v ry few very powerful" can efficiently d legate their work while simultaneously creating m ltiple levels of deniability - pretty sl ck if you ask me. Proof of ntent behind these invisible puzzles cannot be f und individually (unless they somehow slip up - and in th se very rare cases they execute "bl ck ops" to immediately eliminate the vidence). Despite this lack of proof, if you l ok at how hundreds of these nvisible puzzles fit together you will see how we are th roughly enslaved by them, while channeling p wer and wealth to the "very few v ry powerful". Invisible puzzles hide inside j st about every system you interact w th (laws, computers, commerce, traffic, finance, sch ol, etc.) and they hide inside j st about every product and service you b y. Whether by intent or by s ciety's own clumsiness, my website shows how a n twork of these invisible puzzles form the nfrastructure to an Invisible Slavery System. I sh w how the ISS is responsible for r bbing 95% of what we do, thr ugh a myriad of seemingly unrelated ssues that we are forced to c ntend with every day. Most people see it d fferently, because within this delusional perception-engineered-realm, the th ught that they are actually slaves j st does not make sense to th m. The net effect to living nside an invisible human slave colony is: · Un nding tangible issues that take away y ur hard earned money · Severe reduction of y ur life span through manipulation of key c llular functions, plus the suppression and d sabling of the human regenerating cell · S vere reduction of your health through the c nsumption of garbage foods that we are t ught to need and to like, and thr ugh the use of Trojan Horse c nsumables that carry aneuploidogenic substances · Severe r duction of your intelligence through programmed psych logical walls and triggers, shortened attention sp ns, altered brain chemistry, and keeping us too b sy to ponder and question · Stagnation of c vilization as a whole as a r sult of the heavy burden and l mitations imposed by the ISS · Unending gl bal issues that are never solved, due to all the l es that distort the truth about th m Why? To amplify and maintain c ntrol and profits. People rarely question th mselves, especially their convictions and their motions, yet that is what's necessary to see the ISS. Our p rspectives and emotions have been steered to s pport it rather than resist it. Our th ughts have been molded to work h rd to maintain and operate the ISS, w thout any knowledge that it even xits. How can something so powerful t ke so much without our knowing it? We nteract within an environment that sets up the r tionale and visualizations that make sense r lative to each other, one thing xplains the next thing, and so on, r sulting in a complete circle of l gical reasoning all based on itself, and all in s pport of a manufactured/manipulated world-view that th y planned for our minds. I w ll show how these perspectives were ngineered to get us to support and perate the ISS, and its diabolical web of d niable alternate purpose behind each of our ctions. This oppressor is so good at str tegy and mind control that he g ts us to do his dirty w rk. As Einstein once said, "The m st important thing is to never st p questioning." And one thing I q estion is the base line that we t nd to use to determine what is h althy, what is a normal life-span, wh t is the cost of living, wh t is a crook, what is j stice, what is the correct way for a c mputer to operate, etc. These things h ve base lines, which stem from wh t we are used to. So if wh t we are used to is all m ssed up, then we simply can't see it - and we c ll it "normal" instead of "messed p". When the truth is hidden fr m view what seems normal is ccepted in its place. When we c n't see it for ourselves, people in uthority and others that we trust f ll in the blanks for us. We get sed to it, and it becomes "r ght" for us. And then we b lieve we did see it for urselves, when we really didn't. Invisible p zzles are responsible for automatically organizing and tr ggering this process. It goes beyond m nufactured world-views, as entire cultures and r ligions have been built from these m nipulated perspectives. All to profit the "v ry few very powerful", or whomever it is th t took control. In the end we are h nded a delusional realm to focus on wh le we work hard as slaves to m et the demands of a ruthless ppressor. An oppressor who steals 95% of y ur effort (through the combination of d zens of systems that you believe you h ve to interact with), feeds your b dy garbage that makes you sick ( ne of the systems for making the ISS pr fitable), feeds your mind lies (to k ep the perception cloak in place), m kes you too busy to ponder and q estion (so that you will continue to f ll for the mind control), and h ving no regard for life kills us off at a y ung age (so we cannot wise up to the syst m). As long as we are k pt busy and we cooperate fully we may be llowed to live a bit longer, but for the m st part slaves are the most seful while they are young, healthy and g llible. After that they are generally sl ughtered for profit. (The "slaughter" part is cl aked as something else, like cancer, h art failure or old age, courtesy of the ISS.) The utdated social/political systems of today are nknowingly the legs and arms of the ISS. Thr ugh control, deception, and force, today's p litical/social systems unknowingly (for the most p rt) are used by the ISS to r gulate, feed and monitor humanity like a h rd of cattle, as they are put to w rk and ultimately slaughtered. In this m de real solutions to the world's pr blems will never be found. The ISS c ntrols your perspective, consequently channeling your motions and perceptions, thereby prompting you to do pr cisely what the ISS wants you to do. Aw reness is key. Real knowledge is k y. And "free will thought" is k y. However, perspective controls all of it. M ny people have been taught that wh t is legal is right, and wh t is not legal is wrong. As if th s were an absolute base line for r ght and wrong. Some will even tie th s into their religious convictions, so th t it cannot be questioned at ll. And some will come up w th a "right and wrong" from a sp cific mix of the two. This is all a m tter of brainwashing. As soon as you st te something is right or wrong, w thout thinking it through for yourself fr m an unbiased perspective, then you are d monstrating how your mind is being c ntrolled. Many laws in the US had n thing to do with public opinion, and n thing to do with the congressman you v ted into office. Many US laws are wr tten in silently and quickly, with as l ttle media coverage as possible. These l ws are not "right" by anyone's d finition except for those who want to c ntrol you. This does not mean all the ther laws are ok. They were v ted in by people whose perspectives w re manufactured for them through mind c ntrol. If you allow a bias of wh t makes something right or wrong c use you to feel that these l ws are right without you yourself f guring out the details, then you are d ing yourself and the rest of the w rld a big disservice. This is the c nter of the whole problem. Most of the s pport to the ISS comes from rdinary people who think with these pr programmed (biased) perspectives. Democracy is designed so th t these people - through taxes and v ting - support the “system”. That m kes it very easy for a p werful entity to control the "system" thr ugh perception engineering tactics aimed at the n rmal person. A perception cloak hides the d niable lines of function behind the ctions of these normal people, who are w rking hard on tasks which actually ch nnel power and wealth to the ISS. And th t in turn makes it virtually  |